I promise I didn't cheat honey, it was the 3D porno!

Jennifer Stweart (the last name’s not a typo) had a baby. Her son is a beautiful little thing with a huge mop of curly black hair. There’s nothing abnormal about that right?
Well, here’s the thing. 39 y.o Stweart found out she was pregnant whilst her husband was overseas, because he is a soldier in the US Army.

Still, not that weird.
I’m assuming that he had been home recently, and well naturally thought the baby was his.

Well, THIS is where it gets interesting. When Stweart gave birth to her son- he was black. Wait for the punch line… Stweart and her husband are both white.
So it seems a little obvious right? Stweart must have had an affair… Not according to her though.
Stweart claims that on a trip to New York, she watched a 3D porno. (Firstly, a 3D porno…? Please explain) And wouldn’t you believe it? Her baby son looks EXACTLY like the male lead in the porno she claims.
Um, please forgive my cynicism, but really? REALLY? You think you got pregnant by watching a 3D porno?


As I read the article, a few things crossed my mind. Firstly, she was watching the film with friends, I mean I know you share a lot with friends, but surely that’s a little far. Secondly, she was watching the film with friends, and I’m sure I don’t need to give the birds and the bee’s lesson here, so given the fact we KNOW how pregnancy occurs, um what were you doing whilst watching the porno Jennifer Stweart? AND WITH YOUR FRIENDS! Thirdly, a 3D porno, huh? Fourthly, a 3D porno, what? And finally, a 3D porno…WHAT.THE.HECK?


According to Stweart, she started having pregnancy symptoms a month after watching the film.
The most bizarre thing is (if anything could be more bizarre), the husband BELIEVES his wife. She says that he ‘knows she is faithful’, but also says their marriage could be in trouble.

Well duh. Your marriage was in trouble the moment you gave birth to a (gorgeous might I add) black baby, when both you and your husband are white.

(This image is from The News Bizarre Website; Stweart and her son)



I came across this article the other day from website The News Bizarre, but to go straight to the article go to this link.


I bet Tiger Woods wishes he had thought of something like this when all his infidelities came to light. ‘I’m so sorry sweetie; I thought I was watching a 3D porno!’

Sorry Aker, that just doesn't sit well with me...

Jason Akermanis' article in today's Herald Sun has caused controversy. Rightly so too, Akermanis can't expect to write on such a sensitive topic and not get back lash from the general public.
Let's recap what the article is about (This link will take you to the article). Akermanis' opinion piece titled 'Stay in the closet' suggests that gay AFL player's shouldn't 'out' themselves. Firstly, I can't stress the point enough that Aker is NOT gay bashing here. He states numerous times that he is not homophobic, the article is based more around the opinion that the AFL are not ready for gay players (to come 'out').
Excuse me Jason Akermanis, but can I please point out we are in the year 2010, where sexuality is something that (most) people celebrate, and homosexuality is not a taboo subject.
Before I get any deeper into this subject- No, this post is not going to be about how 'stupid' Aker's comments are. Everyone is entitled to their opinion; Aker no exception here. I actually admire the fact he is so openly expressing them- I just don't agree with them, at all.
I belive that there are gay players in the AFL. I believe there are some that the public will never know about, and that is the PLAYER's decision, no one elses.
I'm also willing to bet that a lot of the gay players are confused about their sexuality. It must be such a struggle to deal with their sexuality, let alone dealing with it whilst playing such a 'macho' sport, surrounded by 'macho' men.
An article like this, would NOT help things Aker.
If player's want to stay 'in the closet'- that's their decision. If they want to 'come out'- that's their decision.
As I write this I'm watching the channel 10 news.
Sydney coach Paul Roos has said 'to hear comments like this in 2010 is just bizarre.' (Note: This may not be the exact quote, but it's definately close to it.)
Aker's article has also stunned some of his team members and others around the Western Bulldogs Football Club.
Like I've already said, I completely respect Aker's opinion. And I even agree with his statement that 'being the first AFL player to come out, (would be) too big a burden for any player.'
Definately, BUT given the fact we are in the year 2010, there would be an abundance of councelling, support and acceptance from the player's team, supporters and the general public.
Of-course there is going to be on-field sledging, but there is sledging about EVERY single topic you can imagine. Plus, I'm nearly 100% sure that the player's team members would have that said players back.
You only have to look at the players that have today said that Aker's comments are unusual, Collingwood player Heath Shaw even says there are different characters within every club.

Jason Akermanis- your opinions do have merit, and I understand them as you trying to spare a gay player having to go through unnecessary 'torture' from other players and the community.
However, I do think people can be surprising, and if/when a player decides to publicly decalre they are homosexual, on their own accord, there would be nothing but support and admiration.
You can't tell people what to do Aker, now that is just a fact of life.

Leave a comment, I'm keen to hear about everyone's views on the issue. I'm also keen to see what the AFL board says, Aker isn't generally known for keeping quite about his opinion.